Marc Hauser (Biologist) Wiki, Biography, Age, Wife, Family, Net Worth

Marc Hauser Wiki,Biography, Net Worth

Marc Hauser is an American evolutionary biologist and a researcher in primate behavior, animal cognition and human behavior and neuroscience. Hauser was a Harvard University professor from 1998 to 2011. In 2010 Harvard found him guilty of research misconduct, specifically fabricating and falsifying data, after which he resigned. Because Hauser’s research was financed by government grants, the Office of Research Integrity of the Health and Human Services Department also investigated, finding in 2012 that Hauser had fabricated data, manipulated experimental results, and published falsified findings.

Explore Marc Hauser Wiki Age, Height, Biography as Wikipedia, Wife, Family relation. There is no question Marc Hauser is the most famous & most loved celebrity of all the time. You can find out how much net worth Marc has this year and how he spent his expenses. Also find out how he got rich at the age of 50. He has a pure loving kind heart personality. Scroll Down and find everything about him.

Marc Hauser Wiki, Biography

Date of Birth October 25, 1959
Birth Day October 25
Birth Years 1959
Age 50 years old
Birth Place Switzerland
Birth City
Birth Country Switzerland
Nationality American
Famous As Skydiver
Also Known for Skydiver
Zodiac Sign Capricorn
Occupation Skydiver

Famously known by the Family name Marc Hauser, is a great Skydiver. He was born on October 25, 1959, in Switzerland

Read Also: Rebekah Tiler Wiki, Biography, Age, Net Worth, Family, Instagram, Twitter, Social Profiles & More Facts

Marc Hauser Net Worth

Marc Hauser has a net worth of $5.00 million (Estimated) which he earned from his occupation as Skydiver. Popularly known as the Skydiver of Switzerland. He is seen as one of the most successful Skydiver of all times. Marc Hauser Net Worth & Basic source of earning is being a successful American Skydiver.

Marc entered the career as Skydiver In his early life after completing his formal education..

Net Worth

Estimated Net Worth in 2022 $1 Million to $5 Million Approx
Previous Year’s Net Worth (2021) Being Updated
Salary in 2021 Not Available
Annual Salary Being Updated
Cars Info Not Available
Income Source Skydiver

Social Network

Born on October 25, 1959, the Skydiver Marc Hauser is arguably the world’s most influential social media star. Marc is an ideal celebrity influencer. With his large number of social media fans, he often posts many personal photos and videos to interact with his huge fan base on social media platforms. Personal touch and engage with his followers. You can scroll down for information about his Social media profiles.

Social Media Profiles and Accounts

Twitter Not Available
Instagram Not Available
Facebook Not Available
Wikipedia Marc Hauser Wikipedia
YouTube Not Available
Spotify Not Available
Website Not Available
Itunes Not Available
Pandora Not Available
Googleplay Not Available
Deezer Not Available
Quora Not Available
Soundcloud Not Available

Life Story & Timeline

2013

In his resignation, Hauser stated that he had “some exciting opportunities in the private sector” involving education for high-risk teenagers, but that he might go back to academia “in the years to come.” As of May 2013, Hauser’s LinkedIn profile listed him as a co-founder of the website Gamience, claiming “Scientifically-based games that address global health problems of self-control.”

2012

In September 2012, after conducting a separate investigation, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) found Hauser guilty of scientific misconduct. They concluded that Hauser had fabricated data in one study, manipulated results in multiple experiments, and incorrectly described how studies were conducted. The ORI barred Hauser from certain types of research and required that other research be conducted under supervision. They published a notice stating:

2011

In 2007, Harvard University announced an internal investigation of alleged scientific misconduct by Hauser. In August 2010, the investigators found him solely responsible for eight counts of misconduct, and he took a year’s leave of absence. In July 2011, Hauser resigned his faculty position at Harvard, effective August 1, 2011.

In two additional published papers, some field notes or video recordings were “incomplete”, although Hauser and his co-author replicated the experiments. The Proceedings of the Royal Society published the replication of the missing data in an addendum to one of the papers. In April 2011 Hauser and Justin Wood (coauthor of the original paper) replicated the results of the 2007 Science study and published them—as an addendum—in the journal.

2010

In 2010, Harvard found him guilty of scientific misconduct, and a year later he resigned. Because his research was financed by government grants, the Office of Research Integrity of the Health and Human Services Department also investigated, finding in 2012 that Hauser had fabricated data, manipulated experimental results, and published falsified findings.

The details of this investigation were not publicly released, and the lack of transparency evoked substantial speculation. Writing in the New York Times in August 2010, Nicholas Wade summarized:

On August 20, 2010, Michael Smith, Dean of Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences, released a statement confirming that an internal investigation had found Hauser guilty of eight counts of scientific misconduct. Three counts involved published papers, and five involved unpublished studies. The statement said that Harvard was cooperating with further investigations by the US Office of Research Integrity, the National Science Foundation Office of Inspector General, and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. They stated that they would conduct their own review and make their conclusions available to the public.

In August 2010, after the initial allegations came out, various publications published other accusations and speculations about Hauser’s research, often citing reports by his former students and research assistants.

Although Hauser took a year-long leave of absence from Harvard in 2010, he was at first still planning to teach at the Harvard Extension School, which generated further controversy. On September 1, 2010, his classes at the Extension School were canceled. In April 2011, he was barred from teaching in the Psychology department or any other Arts and Sciences department.

2002

A 2002 paper published in the journal Cognition was retracted. In this paper, Hauser and his collaborators concluded that cotton-top tamarin monkeys could learn simple rule-like patterns.

2001

Hauser and a co-author published a reply to these criticisms, clarifying their coding criteria. However, in 2001 Hauser reported that his subsequent attempts to replicate the experiments were unsuccessful, observing no evidence for the previously claimed result.

1995

In 1995, Hauser reported that cotton-top tamarins can recognize themselves in a mirror. Gordon G. Gallup questioned Hauser’s findings, and reviewed some video recordings of Hauser’s experiment, saying that “when I played the videotapes [for Hauser’s experiments], there was not a thread of compelling evidence — scientific or otherwise — that any of the tamarins had learned to correctly decipher mirrored information about themselves. Upon requesting the remaining videotapes, Gallup was informed that the other tapes had been stolen. Together with Anderson, Gallup published a critical response to Hauser’s article. Their criticism of Hauser’s paper stated that the coding criteria were described in insufficient detail to code the monkeys’ behavior and that, according to their assessment, the cotton-top tamarins did not show the behavior that they considered as evidence for mirror recognition in chimpanzees or other great apes.

1959

Marc D. Hauser (born October 25, 1959) is an American evolutionary biologist and a researcher in primate behavior, animal cognition and human behavior found guilty of fabricated and falsified data. Hauser was a Harvard University professor from 1998 to 2011, when he resigned after being found guilty for research misconduct.”